We’re worrying in the right way: while we can still do something about it. “I think people should be happy that we are a little bit scared of this,” he tells Jarvis. Some researchers even think that new breakthroughs in AI may be the beginning of the end for humanity - that they could make us obsolete, wreak havoc, or kill us all. He knows it has the potential to eliminate jobs and cause massive social upheaval. In the interview with Rebecca Jarvis, Altman admits that he is “a little bit scared” of ChatGPT and its early successes.

All we need to do is make a plan and get everyone on board. It’s nice to think that if we could just get the key players in a room to hash it out, they could articulate a broad consensus on behalf of humanity: What we want from ChatGPT (and all the coming breakthroughs in artificial intelligence), what we don’t, and how these insights can be translated into rules for developers to follow. This data set must be created “by society as a whole, by governments as a whole.” Senate committee this May, he emphasized how important it is to create what he called an “alignment data set” to impose human values on AI. He told the New Yorker back in 2016 that OpenAI was looking for “a way to allow wide swaths of the world to elect representatives to a new governance board” for AI.

If you had representatives from major world governments, you know, trusted international institutions, come together and write a governing document, you know, here is what the system should do, here is what the system shouldn’t do, here’s, you know, very dangerous things that the system should never touch … and then developers of language models like us use that as the governing document….”Īltman has been proposing some version of this for years. This will be one way of many that it could go. “So, I can paint, like, a vision that I find compelling. “Society as a whole? How are we gonna do that?” Sam Altman Doesn’t Want To Be Your AI King Why This AI Moment May Be the Real Deal.

Dont need no usher meaning